-
If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.
-
You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!
|
Discussion Board
Page history
last edited
by PBworks 17 years, 9 months ago
The discussion board is open to anyone who would like to write about our monthly topics regarding Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein and Watergate. Add your comments by clicking on the EDIT PAGE button on top/below this window, or feel free to start a new discussion topic. The wikigate password is "deepthroat". We look forward to hearing your thoughts!
posted November 10, 2006
HOW DID WOODWARD AND BERNSTEIN INFLUENCE JOURNALISM TODAY? DO YOU THINK WOODWARD'S NEWEST BOOK HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE RECENT ELECTION RESULTS?
posted November 6, 2006
WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON ALICIA C. SHEPARD'S NEW BOOK, "WOODWARD AND BERNSTEIN: LIFE IN THE SHADOW OF WATERGATE?'
A pleasant and smooth read. Shepard's book gives some wonderful insight into the personal lives of both Woodward and Bernstein and their journey before and after instant fame. I especially enjoyed the chapter on Robert Redford's perception of the journalists while filming "All the President's Men." I recommend this book to anyone who is interested in Watergate, journalism, or just wants to learn a little bit about two average guys who became international legends overnight.
I've enjoyed working on promoting Alicia Shepard's book, "Woodward and Bernstein: Life in the Shadow of Watergate." It was an entirely new experience for me. I thought that our "Public Communication Writing" course would simply entail cranking out press releases, pitch letters and fact sheets. I had no idea we would read a book about the Watergate scandal and the two journalists who broke the story. I enjoyed reading the book as it was a fast read and took me, as a reader, into the personal lives of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. As someone who was born some time after the Watergate scandal was for me, for all intents and purposes, something of the past, something before my time. I only had a vague understanding of its implications. This book really laid out for a reader like myself who came into it with little background information.
--Zehra
In chapter 11, Shepard talks about Woodward's relationship with CIA director William Casey. In preparing to write his book Veil, Woodward met with Casey more than four dozen times. Despite his close relationship with Casey, Woodward still missed the Iran-contra story.
Interestingly enough, the story wasn't even broke by the American media; it was first exposed on November 3, 1986 by Al-Shirra, a small Lebanese magazine. Shepard says that Woodward came close with some front-page stories he wrote in 1984, but still missed it.
The question left up in the air is whether or not Casey purposefully distracted Woodward from the story. Shepard states the Iran-contra scandal called the presidency itself into question for the second time in 15 years, the first being Watergate. Did Reagan get off easy because he was fortunate enough not to have a great journalist like Woodward break the story?
-Amanda S.
For my senior high school prom, the committee decided that the dance would be held at The Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace in Placentia, California (near the neighborhood in which I grew up). It was an odd request; but most of us were too enthralled with our dresses and our dates to notice the Nixon paraphernalia in the background. In fact, despite cyclic U.S. History classes throughout my life, my only memorable recollection of the “scandal that brought down an American President” was from the movie, “Forrest Gump.”
There is an obvious generation gap when it comes to knowing what the Watergate scandal is about. Many know from books and more so movies of the infamous hotel, the robbery, the anonymous source—Deep Throat, the “smoking gun” tape and at least one of the reporters (usually Bob Woodward) who investigated and wrote about the scandal for The Washington Post. But few persons of my generation know of the other details, like the exact reasons why Nixon resigned or know of the true players involved with bringing about the president’s resignation.
Award-winning author and American University professor, Alicia C. Shepard, delves into these details in her new book, “Woodward and Bernstein: Life in the Shadow of Watergate,” which debunks one of the major myths of the scandal: how two unknown reporters from The Washington Post brought down an American President. Shepard intricately describes the personal and professional lives of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein during and post Watergate. Particularly fascinating is the diverging paths the two journalists take after achieving journalism stardom: from Woodward’s continuous upward success as a journalist and writer in today’s political and journalism spheres, compared to Bernstein’s more professionally subdued path, which was overshadowed by his much public divorce with writer, Nora Ephron, and his struggle to write a long-awaited memoir about his Communist parents.
The book is a great read for individuals who think they know everything about Watergate, or for those who know nothing at all. Shepard is able to capture the struggles and personal triumphs of Woodward and Bernstein, giving readers an in-depth look of the historically corrupt and changing times of United States politics and journalism.
--Karin J.
When I first learned the class would be promoting a book on Watergate, I immediately jumped to conclusions. I thought what novelty could this book possibly offer over the plethora of books already written on the scandal. Boy was I wrong! The impact that Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein emancipated for the profession of journalism is like none other, and that is fully revealed in the book. Specifically, I am referring to famed celebrity and anonymous sources.
As far as celebrity goes, the duo opened the door today where many reporters get first-class access based on the reputation of their work. In reading an article from The New Yorker, it describes how the current White House has generally controlled the press corps similar to guarding a fortress. However, the only exception the piece mentions is of course, Bob Woodward for his everlasting Watergate reputation. Woodward is afforded the luxury of time and space with the President unlike other reporters, which has allowed him to write three books on the Bush Administration. Bernstein receives similar attention by giving speeches and making public appearances in return for money. Depending on what area reporters are covering, this type of star treatment is now normal whether it be in sports, entertainment, or politics.
The fascinating mystery of the source Deep Throat and his identity caused many reporters to use anonymous sources. This has caused a whirlwind on whether unnamed sources are accountable to the same degree as named ones are. The realization is that anonymous sources are effective, but ought to be used in moderation because credibility is at stake. The exception may be in our nation’s capital where unnamed sources are often needed to inform the citizenry of what is occurring inside our ‘trusted’ government. To know this whole debate started with Woodward and Bernstein in helping bring down the Nixon presidency is startling.
As a side note, I find it only appropriate that Woodward and Bernstein are cordial with each other after everything they went through both during and after Watergate.
-- David S. (ds2572a@american.edu)
As a journalism major in college, I studied Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein fairly extensively. They are typically hailed as the fathers of investigative journalism and most communication students are taught that their in-depth reporting on the Watergate scandal reinforced the notion of Journalism acting as the Fourth Estate. When I started in this PR Writing class, I was excited at the prospect of dealing with a new book about Woodward and Bernstein. I was surprised at how much I learned about their personal lives before, during and after the Watergate scandal.
The most interesting thing I learned from Alicia C. Shepard’s book would have to be the fact that Woodward and Bernstein didn’t care for each other at all before they started investigating Watergate. Once I found out that the two men were so drastically different and were such an unlikely pair, it made their story even more interesting.
Another thing that I learned about Woodward and Bernstein is the drama that ensued during the release of All The President’s Men. One of the funniest anecdotes I found was the fact that Bernstein threatened not to go to the opening of the movie at The Kennedy Center if the event was black tie. I thought this was a great example of how “Hollywood” he quickly became after the success of the book and movie.
-- Eleni G.
Discussion Board
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.